<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God is in the Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hergestridge.com/god-is-in-the-details-342/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hergestridge.com/god-is-in-the-details-342</link>
	<description>kill all my demons and my angels might die too</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:46:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Brash</title>
		<link>http://www.hergestridge.com/god-is-in-the-details-342/comment-page-1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Brash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hergestridge.com/?p=342#comment-317</guid>
		<description>&quot;Coming up for Air&quot; is on my reading list, but so far my only advantage over your depth of familiarity lies in the single novel afore mentioned.

From my understanding, Orwell was not a man of extensive education in the field of writing. This is one of my numerous appeals towards him, me being formally undereducated in the writing trade... what ever that means.

Of course, the appeal towards Orwell stretches many fronts, including that of positive influence long after death. As each of us stumbles through life best as we can, we tread on the toes of all that we come in contact with. In the process we leave a lot of things broken and damaged - our sole hope of evening the score is buried in the chance of leaving something positive that will outlive us. I cannot think of a better way to seek that end, but with a pen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Coming up for Air&#8221; is on my reading list, but so far my only advantage over your depth of familiarity lies in the single novel afore mentioned.</p>
<p>From my understanding, Orwell was not a man of extensive education in the field of writing. This is one of my numerous appeals towards him, me being formally undereducated in the writing trade&#8230; what ever that means.</p>
<p>Of course, the appeal towards Orwell stretches many fronts, including that of positive influence long after death. As each of us stumbles through life best as we can, we tread on the toes of all that we come in contact with. In the process we leave a lot of things broken and damaged &#8211; our sole hope of evening the score is buried in the chance of leaving something positive that will outlive us. I cannot think of a better way to seek that end, but with a pen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larissa</title>
		<link>http://www.hergestridge.com/god-is-in-the-details-342/comment-page-1#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>larissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hergestridge.com/?p=342#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Well here I am to salute this writer (one of many) who has sparked your interest, but about whom I admittedly (and ashamedly) know very little. It&#039;s a serious lapse in my reading history, &#039;Animal Farm&#039; being the only title of his that I&#039;ve actually read through. I have much catching up to do...

As for the church&#039;s involvement in its followers&#039; bedrooms, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an explicitly sexual agenda most of the time, but is, as you hint, more about pleasure itself. The only pleasure one should derive should come from God or spirituality itself; all other so-called pleasures are ethereal and fleeting, and aren&#039;t &#039;genuine&#039; as they are earthly pleasures.

But for those of us who only believe in earthly things, well, seeking out earthly pleasures isn&#039;t such an awful task. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here I am to salute this writer (one of many) who has sparked your interest, but about whom I admittedly (and ashamedly) know very little. It&#8217;s a serious lapse in my reading history, &#8216;Animal Farm&#8217; being the only title of his that I&#8217;ve actually read through. I have much catching up to do&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the church&#8217;s involvement in its followers&#8217; bedrooms, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an explicitly sexual agenda most of the time, but is, as you hint, more about pleasure itself. The only pleasure one should derive should come from God or spirituality itself; all other so-called pleasures are ethereal and fleeting, and aren&#8217;t &#8216;genuine&#8217; as they are earthly pleasures.</p>
<p>But for those of us who only believe in earthly things, well, seeking out earthly pleasures isn&#8217;t such an awful task. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

