Of Meetings and Webcams

“Are you Bob?”
“Well yes, I am.”
Judging by the confusion on Bob’s face, I wasn’t convinced that this is the guy I was set to meet.
“Are you expecting an 11:00 o’clock meeting with someone?”
“No.”

Did I mention that introductions can be tricky?

I’m a bit of a geek, and purchase electronics on regular basis. A chain of suppliers that shall remain unnamed – until later in the article – has hit my bad books over the years, but they are hard to ignore. Their stores are everywhere, and they have a lot of toys someone like me likes to play with. As such, once every couple of years I go in to see if their customer service has improved. My last attempt of this kind was a few days ago.

I was after a webcam, but couldn’t resist strolling the aisles to check out the latest goodies. It wasn’t long before I was approached by a ‘helpful sales rep’.

I’ve heard these guys talk. Most of them know shit all about the products they are selling. Sure, they come of as knowledgeable, but in the end they are just sales reps, not tech gurus. The store doesn’t hire gurus, because they are able to match customers with the products they need; The sales reps with limited knowledge push the most expensive products including the useless extended warranties.

After politely declining the assistance offered by the rep, I proceeded on my merry way straight into the face of another rep offering to help, and then another. Three reps in 10 mins.

I found what I needed without their help, and proceeded to the cash register only to find that the whole store has only two, and one of them was closed. The open one was doing a product exchange. While the reps assaulted me in the aisles, here I was stuck at the cash register waiting another five minutes for a single check out clerk to do her job.

Future Shop, get your damn act together. I’ve only been waiting for 10 years for you guys to get this customer service thing figured out. I’ll see you again in 2009, and hopefully by then you’ve finally got it right. I’m won’t hold my breath though.

Posted in Life, Soap Box at May 10th, 2007. 2 Comments.

An Atheist Journey – Part IV

An Atheist Journey Part 4 Watch the Atheist Journey Part IV on YouTube
Published May 8, 2007.

I’d like to begin by withdrawing my original statement in which I say that God does not exist. The fact that we cannot disprove the existence of God aside, the statement kills any potential for dialogue.

And now, I’d like to put a new statement on record. I do not know if a God exist, but am fully backed by the scientific community when I say “There is zero evidence to suggest His existence.” It is my belief that until scientific evidence to the contrary is brought forward, belief in any God is an absurd proposition.

I realise that the average Christian requires a lot of explaining on what constitutes as scientific evidence, but am limited in time, and even more so in the Christian attention span towards matters of science – a fact evident in the misguided Christian understanding of evolution.

If tomorrow we both see what can only be describe as an angel, I still won’t be a God fearing Christian. Seeing an angel would ultimately be one piece of potential evidence that angels exist, and while angels are commonly associated with God, that link is strictly mythical. By ultimately proving that angels exist, we may have a piece of evidence that God exists – if we can scientifically link the dependent association of angels with God.

Can’t wrap your head around the science? That’s okay. Let’s try a mathematical approach.

Consider Bertrand Russell’s statement that “Given the number of conflicting [religious] views on offer, every believer should expect damnation on mere probabilistic grounds.”

Hundreds of religions profess to be the truth. Most are based on ancient scripture, and all on faith. All such religions have an equal stab at validity, but only one can indeed be, for all are mutually exclusive. What are your chances of going to paradise, even if all believers of your faith are deemed worthy of salvation? Statistically, slim to none.

Religion is a bit like communism: okay in theory, and maybe even successful in very small, and select pockets walled off from the reality of the world at large. On a grand scale, religion is the root of much evil. I urge you to consider the difference between ‘it makes me feel good’ and ‘it’s good for humanity’. These two statements are a world apart, and for me they bring to mind the Prisoner’s Dilemma: two factions making the best individual choice are left with an equilibrium where both sides are worse off. Unlike the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the religious choices of those directly involved affect the whole world.

“It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, how ever satisfying and reassuring” (Carl Sagan). Let’s leave our egos at the door step of the 14th century. We’re as special as the koala bear, the aardvark, or the platypus, plus the self awareness. Do not seek spirituality in the myths of the past, or in the blue skies above. Seek it within you, for that is the only place it has the potential to exist in the realm of reality in our universe.

Posted in Anti-theism at May 8th, 2007. No Comments.

On The Move

The separation of Church and State is pending – er, I mean the separation of SimpleBlog and Bytech (keep fighting for the earlier). Today, a whisper of creativity came over me, and on my desk lie the results: a list of potential names. That’s right, SimpleBlog will soon move to its very own domain, and get a new title, too.

Don’t worry, I won’t make you guess at the new location of the blog. A notice with the new address will replace this blog when the move is complete. In the meanwhile, I’ll continue my provocative commentary right here, so stick around!

Posted in Hergest Ridge News at May 5th, 2007. No Comments.

“Is This The Real Thing?”

“How’s the wife doing?”
“She’s been dead for seven years.”

Starting a conversation with a total stranger can be tricky. The exchange I witnessed in the lobby is but one example of a failed attempt. On the other hand, it does make for an excellent intro here.

The trailer for my YouTube series is complete. I’ve missed a few small details, and am fighting the urge to attempt making everything just right. Over the years, I’ve learned that fixing the tiny details is less educational than moving on to use the new experience elsewhere, but the old instinct still remains.

Atheist Journey Intro / Promo Watch the Atheist Journey Promo on YouTube
Published May 2, 2007.

Okay, so chances are I’ll never be a director. Definitely not a lead in anything remotely popular, which is okay since the majority of popular things ‘make me throw up a little.’

No, I’ll settle for a few YouTube viewers slightly amused at my act. On a good day, maybe someone inspired enough to spread some reason, or come clean with their own rationality. A call from Richard Dawkins’ agent to set a time for an intellectual discussion over lunch with Richard himself would be the tops.

Back to reality, as long as I can get the first base covered, I’ll likely continue with the vids.

Posted in Anti-theism, General, Life at May 4th, 2007. No Comments.

‘To Quote Another’

For the benefit of conciseness and efficiency I offer thee not my words, but those of Bertrand Russell. Sure, I could go and try painting a picture of my own, but this case warrants bending my own and unpublished rule of sticking to original content without relying on reprints of readily available material.

Bertrand Russell Photo“If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.”

– Bertrand Russell

Theists will ask “What is so wrong in believing, if it helps me become a better person?” Here, again, I will resort to the words of another.

Richard Dawkins Photo“The reason organized religion merits outright hostility is that, unlike belief in Russell’s teapot, religion is powerful, influential, tax-exempt and systematically passed on to children too young to defend themselves. Children are not compelled to spend their formative years memorizing loony books about teapots. Government-subsidized schools don’t exclude children whose parents prefer the wrong shape of teapot. Teapot-believers don’t stone teapot-unbelievers, teapot-apostates, teapot-heretics and teapot-blasphemers to death. Mothers don’t warn their sons off marrying teapot-shiksas whose parents believe in three teapots rather than one. People who put the milk in first don’t kneecap those who put the tea in first.”

– Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins makes a great case for the importance of placing the Bible alongside other mythology books, and he’s been an important influence on me. Whenever the Christian indoctrination rears its ugly head through my instincts (‘Oh my God, I’m blaspheming! What if…’), I’m quickly brought back to reality with evidence that extinguishes the impulse, and these days the evidence is often recalled in Dawkins’ voice.

Sources: Both quotes used were taken from WikiPedia’s ‘Russell’s Teapot‘ entry.

Posted in Anti-theism at May 2nd, 2007. No Comments.